<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <br /> <br /> <p>DELLOCA v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY</p><br /> <br /> <p>Filed 2/22/08</p><br /> <br /> <p><b>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b></p><br /> <br /> <p>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p><br /> <br /> <p>FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT</p><br /> <br /> <p>DIVISION ONE</p><table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr><td width=319 valign=top><br /> <br /> <p>CONRAD J. DELLOCA et al.,</p><br /> <br /> <p> Plaintiffs and Appellants,</p><br /> <br /> <p>v.</p><br /> <br /> <p>THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,</p><br /> <br /> <p> Defendant and Appellant.</p></td><td width=319 valign=top><br /> <br /> <p> A111267 & A112153</p><br /> <br /> <p> (Marin County</p><br /> <br /> <p> Super. Ct. No. CV 012912)</p><br /> <br /> <p> ORDER MODIFYING OPINION</p><br /> <br /> <p> AND DENYING REHEARING</p></td></tr><tr><td width=319 valign=top></td><td><br /> <br /> <p> [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]</p></td></tr></table><br /> <br /> <p>THE COURT:</p><br /> <br /> <p>It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 29, 2008, be <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">modified</a> as follows:</p><br /> <br /> <p> 1. The last sentence on page 2, which continues onto page 3, should be modified to delete the phrase at the end of the sentence that reads which, presumably, has been distributed, so that the sentence will now read: </p><br /> <br /> <p> In the end, trust receivables were auctioned off for approximately $4.4 million, which, after expenses were deducted, left $1.5 million.</p><br /> <br /> <p> 2. The first sentence after the heading <b><i>The Plaintiffs and Their Claims Against the DFS Defendants</i></b> on page 3 is modified to add a reference to Trust I, so that the sentence will now read: </p><br /> <br /> <p> Plaintiff Conrad J. DellOca, trustee of the DellOca <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">Family Trust</a>, had purchased notes from Trusts I and IV.</p><br /> <br /> <p> 3. The last sentence on page 9, which continues onto page 10, is modified to read:</p><br /> <br /> <p> Mr. Randlett stated that if damages were calculated using June 23, 1998, as the operative date, the plaintiffs <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">damages</a> were between $35 and $36 million, representing $30,730,500 that had been invested after June 23, 1998, plus 25 cents on the dollar on existing investments (as of June 23, 1998) of $20 million.</p><br /> <br /> <p> 4. The second to the last sentence on page 19 is modified to read: </p><br /> <br /> <p> It is not fatal that the court did not characterize its ruling as a finding of lack of causation of the <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">damages</a> sought by plaintiffs. </p><br /> <br /> <p> There is no change in the judgment.</p><br /> <br /> <p> Plaintiffs <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">petition for rehearing</a> is denied.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Dated: ____________________________, </p><br /> <br /> <p> Marchiano, P. J.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Publication Courtesy of <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">California attorney referral</a>.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Analysis and review provided by <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Vista Property line Lawyers.</a></p><br /> <br /> <p><a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com" target="_blank">San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com</a></p>