COLLINS v. PLANT INSULATION COMPANY
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>COLLINS v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b<br /> >COLLINS v.<br /> PLANT INSULATION COMPANY</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/2/10<br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>FIRST<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> ONE<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/>CLORISTEEN<br /> COLLINS, et al.,<br /> <br/> Plaintiffs and Respondents,<br /> <br/>v.<br /> <br/>PLANT<br /> INSULATION COMPANY,<br /> <br/> Defendant and Appellant.<br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> A124268<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> (Alameda<br /> County<br /> <br/> Super. Ct.<br /> No. RG04143303)<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> ORDER MODIFYING OPINION <br /> <br/> AND DENYING REHEARING<br /> <br/> [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> It<br /> is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 3, 2010, be modified as follows:<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>1. On<br /> page 1, the last sentence of the second full paragraph should be modified to<br /> read as follows:<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Throughout<br /> his career, Collins worked extensively with asbestos and asbestos-containing<br /> products, including those distributed and installed by defendant Plant<br /> Insulation Company (Plant).<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>2. On<br /> page 17, the first sentence of the Disposition should be modified to read as<br /> follows:<br /> <br/>The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a<br /> retrial limited to apportionment of fault. <br /> The entities on the list among which the jury on retrial can apportion<br /> fault shall include the Navy and the entitites to which some percentage of<br /> fault was assigned by the jury in the first trial.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>There is no change in the judgment.<br /> <br/>Respondents' petition for rehearing is<br /> denied.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Publication Courtesy of San<br /> Diego County Legal Resource Directory.<br /> <br/>Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.<br /> <br/>San Diego Case Information<br /> provided by www.fearnotlaw.com<br /> <br/> <br /> </div><br /> </body><br /> </html><br />