<p><b>CEBULAR v. COOPER ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <h4>Filed 8/21/06</h4> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><u>CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION</u><a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><u>*</u></a><u></u></p> <br /> <p align="center"><u> </u></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">DIVISION FIVE</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><br /> <tr><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p>JOHN CEBULAR,</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiff, Appellant,</p> <br /> <p> and Respondent,</p> <br /> <p> v.</p> <br /> <p>COOPER ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,</p> <br /> <p> Defendant, Respondent,</p> <br /> <p> and Appellant.</p><br /> </td><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p> B182555</p> <br /> <p> (Los Angeles County</p> <br /> <p> Super. Ct. No. NC035208)</p><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part I ………</b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>Third, the assessment method is not unreasonable merely because plaintiff disagrees with its wisdom. Our Supreme Court has explained, â€