CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >CALIFORNIA</b><b<br /> > </b><b<br /> >SCHOOL</b><b<br /> > BOARDS<br /> ASSOCIATION v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/26/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b<br /> >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>FIRST<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> FOUR<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/>CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION et al.,<br /> <br/> Petitioners and Appellants,<br /> <br/>v.<br /> <br/>STATE BOARD OF<br /> EDUCATION,<br /> <br/> Respondent;<br /> <br/>ASPIRE PUBLIC<br /> SCHOOLS, INC.,<br /> <br/> Real Party in Interest and<br /> Respondent.<br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> A122485<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> (Alameda County Super.<br /> <br/> Ct. No. RG 07353566)<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE <br /> FROM PART I….</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>This statutory scheme, we conclude, reflects an intent<br /> to promote district chartered schools and local oversight while allowing for<br /> limited exceptions. Section 47605.8 is<br /> one such exception, permitting the establishment of a charter school with no<br /> geographic restrictions only if it offers instructional services of a statewide<br /> benefit and only if that benefit would be frustrated if it operated its schools<br /> under district (or county) charters.<br /> <br/><b<br /> ><i > 6. Respondents'<br /> Other Contentions</i></b><br /> <br/> Respondents<br /> point to the regulation adopted by the State Board that requires statewide<br /> charter applicants to â€