<p><b>BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. </b><b>v. </b><b>COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">Filed 8/30/06</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p><a name="plaintiff"></a>BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. et al., )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> <a name="LD"></a>Plaintiffs and Appellants, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S123659</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) <a name="appealnum"></a>Ct. App. 6 H023778</p> <br /> <p><a name="defendant"></a>COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., )</p> <br /> <p> ) <a name="county"></a>Santa Cruz County Super. Ct.</p> <br /> <p> <a name="VD"></a>Defendants and Appellants. ) <a name="supernum"></a>Nos. CV134816 & CV137992</p> <br /> <p>__________________________________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>modification of opinion</b></p> <br /> <p><a name="mainstory"></a>THE COURT:</p> <br /> <p>The opinion herein, filed on June 29, 2006, appearing at 38 Cal.4th 1139, is <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">modified</a> as follows:</p> <br /> <p>The first sentence of the first paragraph on page 1148 is revised to read: â€