BERNARD v. FOLEY PART-II
<p><b>BERNARD v. FOLEY</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <h6>Filed 8/21/06</h6> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p>ANGELA ANN BERNARD et al., )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiffs and Appellants, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S136070</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) Ct.App. 2/3 B168665</p> <br /> <p>JAMES FOLEY, as Trustee, etc., )</p> <br /> <p> ) Los Angeles County</p> <br /> <p> Defendant and Respondent. ) Super. Ct. No. BP072862</p> <br /> <p>_______________________________________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part I ……….</b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>Our conclusion accords with the overall purpose of section 21350. The public policy underlying that statute â€