Filed 7/2//26 P. v. Gallegos CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B342363
(Super. Ct. No. 2023014890)
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)
v.
JAIME GALLEGOS,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appellant Jaime Gallegos challenges the trial court’s
restitution order, requesting our independent review under
People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
Gallegos worked for the Ventura Unified School District as
a campus supervisor for Ventura High School. He was accused of
charging the Oxnard Soccer Association and the United Premier
Veterans Soccer League improperly for field reservations for their
soccer games.
The Ventura County District Attorney filed a seven-count
complaint alleging Gallegos committed three felony counts of
grand theft (Pen. Code1, § 487, subd. (a)), counts 1, 2, and 5; two
felony counts of unauthorized use of personal identifying
information of another (§ 530.5, subd. (a)), counts 3 and 4; and
two misdemeanor counts of forgery (§ 470, subd. (d)), counts 6
and 7.
Gallegos pled guilty to count 1 pursuant to a plea bargain.
The trial court suspended imposition of sentence, placed Gallegos
on probation for two years, and ordered him to serve 150 days in
jail as a condition of probation. The court also ordered Gallegos
to pay restitution of $9,083.85 to the Oxnard Soccer Association
and $3,232.95 to the United Premier Veterans Soccer League.
This is the order he challenges.
On March 12, 2026, Gallegos’s appointed counsel filed a
brief pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. The
brief included a declaration stating counsel had written to
Gallegos, explained the brief counsel was filing, and informed
him of his right to file a supplemental brief. On March 12, 2026,
we advised Gallegos by mail that he had 30 days to file a
supplemental brief raising any issues he wished us to consider.
We did not receive a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied no
arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp.
441-443.) The restitution order is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
CODY, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, Acting P. J. BALTODANO, J.
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2
Catherine M. Voelker, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura
______________________________
Jason Szydlik, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
3