<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/templates/default/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
 xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"> 
<channel>
<title>Fear Not Law</title>
<link>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<atom:link href="https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/rssfeed.php?catid=508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<title>Defense Arguments on Timing of Challenge</title>
<description>NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF

In case:

ROQUE &quot;ROCKY&quot; DE LA FUENTE, an individual; DR. MARK SEIDENBERG, an individual; the AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY OF CALIFORNIA; DR. ROBERT ORNELAS, an individual; DANIELLE DE LA FUENTE, an individual, Plaintiffs,
V.
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State for the State of California; and DOE 1 through DOE 60 inclusive, Defendants

Addresses timeliness of ballot challenge.</description>
<link>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/defense-arguments-on-timing-of-challenge-287.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/defense-arguments-on-timing-of-challenge-287.html</guid>
<comments>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/thread/287/</comments>   
</item>

</channel>
</rss>