<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/templates/default/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
 xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"> 
<channel>
<title>Fear Not Law</title>
<link>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<atom:link href="https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/rssfeed.php?catid=442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<title>In re Tobacco II cases</title>
<description></description>
<link>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/in-re-tobacco-ii-cases-116.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/in-re-tobacco-ii-cases-116.html</guid>
<comments>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/thread/116/</comments>   
</item>

<item>
<title>In re Tobacco II cases</title>
<description>In the Tobacco II cases, Judge Prager of the San Diego Superior Court decertified a class based on the passage of proposition 64.  The Supreme Court of California, in a divisive decision, overruled Judge Prager.</description>
<link>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/in-re-tobacco-ii-cases-115.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/in-re-tobacco-ii-cases-115.html</guid>
<comments>https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/thread/115/</comments>   
</item>

</channel>
</rss>