https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery en-us Court must conduct ex parte in camera review of sealed affidavit that defendant submits in support of his motion to discover police personnel records pursuant to Evidence Code Sec. 1043. Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for discovery of police records--without first holding in camera review of whether disclosure would violate constitutional rights or attorney-client privilege--on basis that he refused to provide opposing party with unredacted copy of sealed supporting declaration under protective order. https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/williams-v-superior-court-city-of-anaheim-fourth-district-div-three-23.html Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:01:44 GMT https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/williams-v-superior-court-city-of-anaheim-fourth-district-div-three-23.html https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/thread/23/ Memorandum of authorities to suppress statements made to a CPS worker that interviewed an accussed, while in custody. Bases for suppression is that the nature of the investigation was compulsory, was custodial, and violated the accussed's rights protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment. https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/motion-to-suppress-statements-made-to-cps-2.html Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:54:49 GMT https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/images/motion-to-suppress-statements-made-to-cps-2.html https://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/thread/2/