legal news

Register | Forgot Password


Next Listing
Description Where party sought to enforce subpoena duces tecum for business records against district attorney pertaining to documents prepared by local police department and California Highway Patrol that were in district attorney’s possession, court should have denied subpoena on ground that district attorney was not custodian of records within meaning of Evidence Code Sec. 1561 because district attorney and his subordinates were not able to attest to documents’ authenticity and trustworthiness as required by section.
Ownership scott
Views 561 views. Averaging 0 views per day.
Similar Listings
John B. v. Superior Court (Bridget B.) - filed July 3, 2006, Cite as 2006 SOS 3418
Firestone v. Hoffman - filed June 29, 2006, Second District, Div. One
Karlsson v. Ford Motor Company - filed June 27, 2006, Second District, Div. Eight
Williams v. Superior Court (City of Anaheim) Fourth District, Div. Three
Pfizer v. Superior Court (Galfano)
Submission Date 01/07/06 (Edited 01/07/06)

scott's Membership Status

Registration Date: Sep 25, 2005
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 78 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 21/07/21 - 07:38:53

Biographical Information

Location: San Diego, California
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (58 years old)

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Find all listings submitted by scott

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2022 The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2022 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.