legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.J.
R.R. (mother) appeals the juvenile court’s orders denying her petition to reinstate family reunification services (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388),[1] terminating parental rights to her daughter, M.J., and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (§ 366.26.) Mother contends (1) the court abused its discretion by denying her section 388 petition without an evidentiary hearing and (2) the beneficial parent-child relationship exception precludes the child’s adoption. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale