P. v. Ghoston
Yolanda Ghoston (defendant) challenges her convictions arising from identity theft and theft from an elderly man because the trial court admitted evidence that she did nearly the same thing to another elderly man to prove her identity, intent and a common scheme or plan. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting this evidence. We affirm the conviction, but require that the abstract be corrected on a handful of issues.
Comments on P. v. Ghoston