P. v. Mays
Willie Mays appeals from the judgment after a jury found him guilty of one count of attempted second degree commercial burglary and the court found the prior prison term allegations true. Mays argues that the court erred in revoking his pro per status at the commencement of the trial and in excluding him from the courtroom during a portion of the trial. Those arguments have no merit. We agree, however, that Mays’s custody credits should be recalculated.
Comments on P. v. Mays