legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Sandra M.
The mother, Josephine D., appeals from an October 24, 2012 parental rights termination order. The mother argues she was prejudiced by the juvenile court’s decision to proceed with the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing and terminate her parental rights.[1] The mother contends a delay in the section 366.26 hearing was warranted because the department was in the process of placing the child, Sandra M., with a relative. Had the child been placed with a relative, the mother potentially could have retained parental rights under the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) exception to adoption. We conclude the mother forfeited the delay issue. We affirm the order terminating the mother’s parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale