In re M.D.
At a six-month review hearing, the juvenile court found that S.N.’s children were at substantial risk of detriment if returned to her custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e).)[1] S.N. appeals, arguing that the juvenile court’s finding is not supported by substantial evidence.[2] We affirm.
Comments on In re M.D.