P. v. Price
Defendants Leo Dalton Price and Kristina Pelache appeal a judgment entered following a jury trial. On appeal, Price asserts the trial court erred by not declaring a doubt during his trial and sentencing as to his competence pursuant to Penal Code section 1385.[1] Pelache asserts the trial court erred by imposing probation conditions that were unconstitutionally overbroad.
Comments on P. v. Price