P. v. Pixley
Filed 4/11/06 P. v. Pixley CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TAYLOR J. PIXLEY, Defendant and Appellant. | E037727 (Super.Ct.No. SWF009315) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. James T. Warren, Judge. Affirmed.
Amanda F. Benedict, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On March 4, 2005, in case No. SWF009315, the District Attorney of Riverside County filed an amended felony complaint. The defendant, represented by counsel, pled guilty to six counts (counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 18) of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (b)(1), a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under the age of 14 by means of force.
Thereafter, and in accordance with the negotiated disposition, the defendant was committed to state prison for 36 years, less custody credits, and the remaining counts and special allegations were dismissed and stricken on motion of the district attorney. (Pen. Code, § 1385.)
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
/s/ RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
/s/ McKINSTER
J.
/s/ KING
J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Apartment Manager Attorneys.
