legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.C.

In re S.C.
01:31:2013






In re S










In re S.C.



















Filed 1/22/13 In
re S.C. CA4/1

>

>

>

>

>

>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

>





California Rules of Court, rule
8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
8.1115(b). This opinion has not been
certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.



COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



STATE OF CALIFORNIA






>










In re S.C. et
al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.







SAN DIEGO COUNTY
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



ELIZABETH R.
et al.,



Defendants and Appellants.




D062641





(Super. Ct. No.
J517282A-B)




APPEAL
from an order of the Superior Court of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">San Diego
County, Carol Isackson, Judge.
Dismissed.



Elizabeth
R., Phil R. and Alec C. appeal findings and orders entered at a permanency plan
and selection hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections
388 and 366.26. Citing >In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952,
they ask this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

In
In re Sade C., the California
Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25
Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment
or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting his [or her] custody of a
child or his [or her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13
Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny
appellants' requests to review the record for error and to address the >Anders issues. (>Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Appellants'
counsel ask this court to exercise its discretion to provide their clients the
opportunity to file supplemental briefs in propria
persona
(In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835), and also ask this
court to order counsel to brief any arguable
issue
(Penson v. Ohio
(1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88). The requests are denied.

DISPOSITION

The
appeals are dismissed.



O'ROURKE, J.



WE CONCUR:







HUFFMAN,
Acting P.J.







MCDONALD,
J.







Description Elizabeth R., Phil R. and Alec C. appeal findings and orders entered at a permanency plan and selection hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 388 and 366.26. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, they ask this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale