legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Hector Z.

In re Hector Z.
01:31:2013






In re Hector Z










In re Hector Z.

















Filed 1/22/13 In
re Hector Z. CA4/1

>

>

>

>

>

>

>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN
OFFICIAL REPORTS

>





California Rules of Court, rule
8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
8.1115(b). This opinion has not been
certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.



COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



STATE OF CALIFORNIA






>










In re HECTOR
Z., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.







SAN DIEGO COUNTY
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



PEDRO Z. et
al.,



Defendants and Appellants.




D062860





(Super. Ct. No. J51580B)




APPEALS
from orders of the Superior Court of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">San Diego
County, Gary G. Haehnle, Judge. Dismissed.



Pedro Z. and Cristal A. appeal the
findings and orders entered at the termination of href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">parental rights hearing held under
Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, including the denials of their
section 388 petitions. Citing >In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952,
they ask this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

In In re Sade C., the
California Supreme Court held review under href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436
is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order
obtained by the state, adversely affecting his [or her] custody of a child or
his [or her] status as the child's parent." (In re
Sade C.
, supra,> 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny Pedro's and Cristal's
requests to review the record for error and to address their >Anders issues. (Anders
v. California
(1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Citing In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, Pedro's and Cristal's
counsel also ask this court to exercise its discretion to provide them the
opportunity to file supplemental briefs in propria
persona
. The requests are denied.

DISPOSITION

The appeals are dismissed.





IRION,
J.



WE CONCUR:







McCONNELL, P. J.







O'ROURKE, J.









Description Pedro Z. and Cristal A. appeal the findings and orders entered at the termination of parental rights hearing held under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, including the denials of their section 388 petitions. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, they ask this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order obtained by the state, adversely affecting his [or her] custody of a child or his [or her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny Pedro's and Cristal's requests to review the record for error and to address their Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Citing In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, Pedro's and Cristal's counsel also ask this court to exercise its discretion to provide them the opportunity to file supplemental briefs in propria persona. The requests are denied.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale