P. v. Mallett



P. v. Mallett


Filed 10/3/08 P. v. Mallett CA2/2






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION TWO



THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


KERRY EDWARD MALLETT,


Defendant and Appellant.



B205389


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. KA080597)



THE COURT:*


Kerry Edward Mallett appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of two counts of second degree commercial burglary (Pen. Code, 459)[1]arising out of the following. In early September 2007, Toan Do reviewed surveillance videos of his laundry business which showed defendant breaking the locks to the coin boxes of the laundry machines and taking the coins. On September 20, 2007, by remote video surveillance, Do saw defendant break a new lock Do had installed. Do called the police who apprehended defendant with a bin containing clothes, screwdrivers, pliers, quarters, and a cordless device.


Defendant was sentenced to the midterm of two years on count one, plus eight months on count two. Execution of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation. We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.


After examination of the record, counsel filed an Opening Brief in which no issues were raised.


On July 3, 2008, we advised defendant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.


We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)


The judgment is affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.


Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.


Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line attorney.


San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com







* BOREN, P. J., ASHMANN-GERST, J., CHAVEZ, J.


[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.



    Home | Contacts | Submit New Article | Site Leaders | Search
    © 2005 Fearnotlaw.com