Chavez v. City of Los Angeles

^{Chavez v. City of Los Angeles}

^{Filed: 8/20/08 Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCA2/7}

^{NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS}

^{California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.}

^{IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA}

^{SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT}

^{DIVISION SEVEN}

ROBERT CHAVEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

B196255 (Los AngelesCounty Super. Ct.No. BC311284) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

^{THE COURT:}

^{It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 21, 2008be modified as follows:}

^{On page 18, at the end of the first sentence of the first full paragraph, add as footnote 11 the following footnote, which will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes:}

^{11 The Citys assertion that different portions of Dr. Monteiros notes suggest she initially concluded Chavez presented as delusional and paranoid only underscores the existence of triable issues of material fact.}

^{Respondents petition for rehearing is denied. There is no change in judgment.}

^_

^{PERLUSS, P. J. ZELON, J.}

^{Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.}

^{Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line Lawyers.}

^{San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com}